Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
seriously, not here.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(61)
-
▼
February
(19)
- a stretch and a yawn
- my principal principle
- max daddy crow
- a brief morning story
- la vida sin conocimiento es muerte en disfraz
- a second comment to mr. peanut
- meaty dreams
- a healthy shit and hope: they both float
- ashes to ashes, crumbs to crumbs...
- a good friend's good poem.
- anything else?
- branching out. sweet lemons. and humanity.
- what's up...
- veo sonrisas en todo
- by jacob braaten: bears like flowers
- tonight's open-mic. and passports.
- blue scholars. seattle. shout out.
- Theodore Goes to School
- first issue: "of moths in holy clothing"
-
▼
February
(19)
2 comments:
Can you eat cooked food, because peanuts are cooked even if unsalted.
As for "floating versus sinking," one school argues that stools should float. Ferreira says buoyancy is a sign that the body has absorbed the minerals in the food and that these nutrients are not contained in the waste. Another camp believes healthy bowel movements should touch bottom because of their bulk and fiber content. Loftness is not impressed with either argument: "Most stools will sink," he says. "Whether it floats or sinks really doesn't seem to make any difference."
no, the idea would be no cooked food. the peanuts i have are "raw" according to the label. i'm not too sure about any of it, however. i'll do some research! thanks for the info!
i don't believe that hoosh-wash about buoyancy not mattering. i think it does, and will fight to the death defending that view if need be.
Post a Comment